3 ms·
I agree. It wasn't a criticism of the trials, but rather the officials making claims for which there is no data.
by refurb 4y ago
I agree. It wasn't a criticism of the trials, but rather the officials making claims for which there is no data.
- gcanyon 4y agoThere wasn't no data, just not specific statistical data from experimentation with these vaccines. Experts had data on previous vaccines, general knowledge of symptomatology, contagion, etc. It's only reasonable that reasonable experts might differ on the specifics given the level of extrapolation, but that's not "no data".