4 ms·
I think the point is that the sample readings were in the range of voltmeter, but if some sample crossed 100V it would show as 100V in the voltmeter. So even th
by YetAnotherNick 4y ago
I think the point is that the sample readings were in the range of voltmeter, but if some sample crossed 100V it would show as 100V in the voltmeter. So even though no sample crossed 100V, the data is clipped still.
- whatshisface 4y agoThat's not good statistics - just because the precision of measurements falls off sharply at 100V doesn't mean that out-of-range readings aren't valid measurements.
- YetAnotherNick 4y agoAssume we got one out of range measurement out of 100. We can't say anything about variance of reading if we don't have any prior on variance ie using bayesian statistics. That's the joke that traditional statistician can't figure out the obvious thing.