A reduction in 'pitting people against each other', could paradoxically allow for civil disagreement because of decreased polarisation. I.e. if I go on a platf

A reduction in 'pitting people against each other', could paradoxically allow for civil disagreement because of decreased polarisation. I.e. if I go on a platform and I expect strong/aggressive disagreement as my engagement, I am more likely to counter argue. If I'm on a platform where views are more moderate, I am more likely to carefully consider a different viewpoint. I agree there are risks of bubbles though.