3 ms·
But it’s such a vague statement that it could actually apply to lots of things. Like say advertisements. Say dating. Say pretty much everything that happens
by reillyse 4y ago
But it’s such a vague statement that it could actually apply to lots of things.
Like say advertisements.
Say dating.
Say pretty much everything that happens all the time.
The definition of fraud you use is overly general.
- sokoloff 4y agoPerhaps you could provide another reasonable definition of fraud to support an argument that this behavior is not fraudulent?
- bryanrasmussen 4y agoI'm pretty sure a lot of what is described would fall under fraud in most jurisdictions if these things are in either of the contracts, as they tend to be in mine. 1. Length of hours worked per week and work start and end - if you are supposed to be working in times between 8 and 17 with a total of 37.5 hours worked per week if you do a couple 1 hour meetings between 9 and 16 for employer B every day then you have defrauded employer A because it would be impossible for you to make that 37.5 hours between 8 and 17 they are paying you for. You have deceived the company that you are working for them and receiving compensation while working for another company. It's pretty open and shut in legal terms and no but what about lying to a date pontificating is going to change that. 2. Do the contracts with companies have clauses about how they own everything you product technology wise while working for them? on edit: changed time usage from American to Military Time / European in one instance so all usages were aligned.