3 ms·

Examples: https://www.google.com/search?q=site:.com+inurl:%22humans.txt%22+%22the+humans+responsible+%26+colophon%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=site:.com+

• myfonj 4y ago
  > site:.com inurl:"humans.txt" "the humans responsible & colophon" That yields just "About 139 results". But searching for inurl:humans.txt filetype:txt [1] gives "About 2,030 results". Quite surprised seeing it somewhat adopted by Google and Netflix, but not exactly in the way proposed by the "standard". https://www.google.com/humans.txt https://www.google.com/humans.txt (Vague.) https://www.netflix.com/humans.txt https://www.netflix.com/humans.txt (Promotional misuse, probably.) https://www.paulirish.com/humans.txt https://www.paulirish.com/humans.txt (Awww.) [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:humans.txt+filetype:txt https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:humans.txt+filetype:tx...
• diegof79 4y ago
  Looking at the examples, it seems that most companies use humans.txt as an Easter egg for curious people. The one from Medium is “fun” because the only contact info that they share is from people who reported security bugs: https://medium.com/humans.txt https://medium.com/humans.txt