I agree. But I can't imagine what that would look like. Arbitrary discontinuation of service is a tangible harm. But how could one possibly compel a provider to

I agree. But I can't imagine what that would look like. Arbitrary discontinuation of service is a tangible harm. But how could one possibly compel a provider to do otherwise? You'd have to do something like construe the provision of service as an implied contract to continuity in the same way that T&Cs assert that usage of a system implies acceptance of some rules.