3 ms·

You’re wrong. Just because it’s not the absolute peak of efficiency, written in C with asm routines to talk to the db, doesn’t mean it’s not efficient.

• datalopers 4y ago
  https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21&test=composite https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21&tes... Django ranks #137 out of #142 across numerous web frameworks and languages. It’s literally one of the least performant options that exist.
  • scrollaway 4y ago
    Performance and efficiency aren’t the same thing. Django does a lot of things other frameworks ranked here don’t do. Such framework rankings are also utterly irrelevant when you want something widely used enough to easily find contributors and integrations. That restricts you quite a bit more than “any so called framework that just handles http”. Did you even look at the top performers on that page? This is number 2: https://github.com/Xudong-Huang/may_minihttp https://github.com/Xudong-Huang/may_minihttp
  • college_physics 4y ago
    mastodon is ruby on rails, just sligthly more "efficient" from django according to those benchmarks