18 ms·
Surely they’ll pull him. The NYT may act like its above the people, the politics, but even this would be an overreach. However, if SBF is committed to showing u
by Overtonwindow 4y ago
Surely they’ll pull him. The NYT may act like its above the people, the politics, but even this would be an overreach. However, if SBF is committed to showing up, then it could be the paper’s moment to shine. However I don’t think the Times quite has the nation’s confidence that it once enjoyed ..long ago.
- fidesomnes 4y ago
- Bubble_Pop_22 4y ago> then it could be the paper’s moment to shine The NYT having SBF speak at one of their conferences would be the paper's moment to shine?
- Overtonwindow 4y agoYes. If a tough reporter really nails him down with a tough interview, it could be a shining moment for journalism. If they fawn over him, as some have suggested of recent coverage, then it will be a failure. The NYT should keep him, dare him to show up, and then do their jobs: Hold his feet to the fire.
- MrRiddle 4y ago
- eli 4y agoThe summits are about making money not news.
- m348e912 4y agoEven if it is a money-making endeavor, the NYT could slightly mend its journalistic reputation with some hard-hitting questions to SBF. They have been soft-handed so far in their reporting on SBF and FTX and it reeks of major bias and conflict of interest. In case anyone doesn't know what I am referring to, here is some background. https://www.publish0x.com/making-cents/whats-wrong-with-the-nyt-article-about-sbf-xjrynyr https://www.publish0x.com/making-cents/whats-wrong-with-the-...
- chrchang523 4y agoNote that they aren't pulling him: https://twitter.com/andrewrsorkin/status/1595517635441090565 https://twitter.com/andrewrsorkin/status/1595517635441090565