5 ms·
I don't think the set of laws should be growing boundlessly year after year. Another idea is to adapt the house cleaning rule: to pass a new law, you must first
by throwup 4y ago
I don't think the set of laws should be growing boundlessly year after year. Another idea is to adapt the house cleaning rule: to pass a new law, you must first get rid of an old law.
- geysersam 4y agoWhy put such arbitrary restrictions on our elected lawmakers? Reducing regulatory complexity is a worthwhile goal, but that's a bad way of going about it.
- enraged_camel 4y agoJust imagine: the day after the new search feature goes live, the product manager comes to you and asks where the user profiles have gone. You say, "oh, I removed them - I think it's a good idea to remove an existing feature after adding a new one! Complexity, after all, is bad!"
- BlueTemplar 4y agoIf you try to show all the icon bars in Office at the same time, you'll end up with half of your screen buried under them. There are diminishing returns.
- polygamous_bat 4y agoReplace "laws" with "features" or "lines of code" in your comment. Read it again. How much sense does it make?
- Cyberdog 4y agoMy friend, I don't think that's the epic airtight gotcha that you think it is…
- polygamous_bat 4y agoYou did not explain why, though. So I must remain here in my belief that my argument makes clear sense.