3 ms·
I agree. The README file presents it like an alternative to `requestIdleCallback`, while, in fact, it is a convenience wrapper around `requestIdleCallback`. It
by warpech 4y ago
I agree. The README file presents it like an alternative to `requestIdleCallback`, while, in fact, it is a convenience wrapper around `requestIdleCallback`. It is a nice idea, but the description makes it confusing.
- nuko-suke-dev 4y ago>The README file presents it like an alternative to `requestIdleCallback`, while, in fact, it is a convenience wrapper around `requestIdleCallback`. It is a nice idea, but the description makes it confusing. That's right. I changed README to everyone to understand it. https://github.com/hiroki0525/idle-task#features https://github.com/hiroki0525/idle-task#features