5 ms·
You may want to review https://www.git-scm.com/about/trademark https://www.git-scm.com/about/trademark They have been stingy about projects with git in the nam
by zeckalpha 4y ago
You may want to review https://www.git-scm.com/about/trademark https://www.git-scm.com/about/trademark
They have been stingy about projects with git in the name.
- HighlandSpring 4y agotig-bug would be fun
- fishbacon 4y agoIt also locks the scope to just git in the mind of the reader. Even if the scope broadens down the road. A less specific name might benefit the project? The part after the colon will explain the actual purpose.
- M4v3R 4y agoHave they? GitKraken & GitLens are pretty popular, commercial offerings, and they have been on the market for years. [0] https://www.gitkraken.com https://www.gitkraken.com
- michaelmure 4y agoThey have been quite ok[1] about the trademark aspect, but they do have a point about the namespace grab. I'm actually at a point where I do consider opting out of the git integration[2], as the introduction of new entities (project board, pr ...) do make things confusing (or even conflicting) as a series of git sub-commands. I haven't came up with a really satisfying solution though. [1]: https://marc.info/?l=git&m=153457109619678&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=git&m=153457109619678&w=2 [2]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/530 https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/530
- xyzzy_plugh 4y agoThis is a bit weird to me. It's Git's own convention to add subcommands by placing a binary on the $PATH with the prefix `git-`. In this case, the subcommands becomes `git bug ...`. How would one name this differently? I tend to think this is more about commercial projects.
- Klasiaster 4y agoGit plugins must have binaries that start with "git-" because that's how they become subcommands. If the binary is called "git-something" for that reason, and it's about the project git anyway, it kind of makes sense to use this as project name.