6 ms·
How can they possibly do this without exposure to liability? At some point a vehicle is going to do something atrocious, and the owner will have the means (or
by rkagerer 4y ago
How can they possibly do this without exposure to liability?
At some point a vehicle is going to do something atrocious, and the owner will have the means (or find a sympathetic litigator) to sue the crap out of the company.
- Someone1234 4y ago> At some point a vehicle is going to do something atrocious Multiple people have already died[0] [0] https://fortune.com/2022/10/19/tesla-cars-involved-in-10-of-the-11-new-crash-deaths-linked-to-automated-tech-vehicles/ https://fortune.com/2022/10/19/tesla-cars-involved-in-10-of-...
- bryanlarsen 4y agoNo indication of whether those are autopilot or FSD, or whether the Tesla was at fault. Musk used to state no FSD deaths during quarterly conference calls, I think he's stopped so there probably has been some. I don't expect FSD to be 100% perfect, but I want it to be about 10X safer than humans. Any less safe leaves too many unknowns. Any more safe means we waited too long to enable it for unnecessary deaths. -- Tesla owner without FSD.
- orev 4y ago> How can they possibly do this without exposure to liability? They can’t, just like human drivers can’t drive without liability, which is why insurance is required for all drivers. Auto insurance companies determine rates based on risk that’s assessed based on many factors related to the driver. They could do the same by assessing the risk associated with using the software. At least then it would have some kind of independent review.