Subjective, but I also find Arch documentation to be "better" because it more frequently answers my question in less time. You could say *BSD documentation is

Subjective, but I also find Arch documentation to be "better" because it more frequently answers my question in less time. You could say *BSD documentation is more "comprehensive" but I usually find myself wading through an ocean to find what I'm looking for. On top of that, every time you try to look elsewhere, you just see RTFM. I can respect the sentiment, but having different variations of the same documentation can help understanding imo