> But the blog post basically list a single symptom and jumps right to the one conclusion that fits what the author expects. That conclusion isn't wrong though

> But the blog post basically list a single symptom and jumps right to the one conclusion that fits what the author expects. That conclusion isn't wrong though. Your comment basically claims author is twisting facts but the conclusion remains that giving google.com/maps permission to geotrack does give google.com permission to geotrack. "Pinky swear I won't enforce that clause" is not reassurance enough.