2 ms·

Those are valid points but that's a different meaning of value as used in the article.

• BLKNSLVR 4y ago
  No they're not valid points, they're purely subjective and with no comparison.
  • cinntaile 4y ago
    He said "one can argue", he did not claim he was 100% right. They are definitely points that you can debate around, they are different from what The Economist was talking about.
    • BLKNSLVR 4y ago
      Ironically, then, that "one can argue" is 100% correct :)
      • cinntaile 4y ago
        I don't get what you're trying to say.
        • BLKNSLVR 4y ago
          Apologies, I was being facetious because I was tired, and I think your previous comment was correct. I did the non-HN thing and misinterpreted (towards negativity) the original to which I first replied.