science fiction is easy. the reality would probably look very different. in my opinion statism is at fault because it is the manifestation of "let us, here, ve

science fiction is easy. the reality would probably look very different. in my opinion statism is at fault because it is the manifestation of "let us, here, very locally, protect each others shit, while exploiting all the others" this thought, or concept of "us and them", (for some it starts even more locally: "mine/yours") divides ppl and funnels assets to those that can afford them. average downvoter "but mlatu, dont you own a car? what if someone took it from you?" me:"in this society? that would be theft, and i'd have to call the cops and my insurance company because im still paying that rustbowl off! but imagine instead, if i could trust that there was a different car available so i still could get home, i wouldnt mind it, or if i could trust that there was another as-good solution to getting home as me driving my car there, let me use it!" society could be based on sharing instead of on hoarding... one if these days ill have the time to develop some societal simulation model or something... "owning property" used to be very important, when there were only a couple hundred million of us on this rock, but i believe, the longer we remain on-planet, the more important it gets to overhaul that in favor of equaly sharing all resources. all in favour of fully automated luxury gay space communism say "where's mah figs?"