3 ms·
Anyone can do "concurrency" by starting from scratch with a fresh process each time. That isn't "having a concurrency story" it's rather the opposite I think. I
by colonwqbang 4y ago
Anyone can do "concurrency" by starting from scratch with a fresh process each time. That isn't "having a concurrency story" it's rather the opposite I think. It's very wasteful of system resources, energy, etc.
- stevewatson301 4y agoPHPs model would be okay if they used green threads/goroutines. That way, you can have a far larger number of workers, as most of them are blocked on database connections or HTTP requests to other services.
- heurisko 4y agoPHP's model is different, not a mistake. It has proved successful so far. The shared-nothing, short-lived process avoids classes of issues such as with slow memory leaks, accidentally blocking event loops, and shared memory threading issues. Most PHP sites will utilise php-fpm, so it isn't really true that each request will spawn another PHP process. The language historically hasn't been that great, but its shared-nothing architecture has always been the good part.
- weatherlite 4y agoOn the other hand its simple and works for many many people and apps. I wouldn't just discount it. The fact that "Anyone can do" it is a pro.