5 ms·
If you're complaining about this law, it means you don't think it's necessary. If you don't think it's necessary, then you clearly have no idea what women go th
by sneakerblack 4y ago
If you're complaining about this law, it means you don't think it's necessary. If you don't think it's necessary, then you clearly have no idea what women go through in the workplace.
This comment only servea to show your own insecurities and ignorance about women's careers.
- raxxorraxor 4y agoYou could also complain about this law because it is sexist. This time for real compared to the shallow allegation that demographic distribution implies prejudice. This has been proven wrong many times, but it still is the justification. The EU ignores evidence in favor of real sexism, that would have been lessened by itself without the EU. Your argument is circular in unsubstantiated too.
- chewz 4y agoHow about wealth inequality? Shoudn't 40 percent of billionares be poor people by law? You have no idea what poor people have to go through to become a bilionare....
- sneakerblack 4y agoIf you're saying governments should pass laws to reduce wealth inequality, I agree. Poor people are bad for society and it is cheaper and better for society and the global economy to get them out of poverty.
- inglor_cz 4y ago"If you don't think it's necessary, then you clearly have no idea what women go through in the workplace. " This law is about the top jobs in big corporations, so the people involved are mostly from the top 0,5 per cent of the society. Men or women, they aren't the ones struggling with any real oppression. The only result is that blatant nepotism is going to be a bit more gender balanced. Probably counts as a progress, if gender is all that counts.