3 ms·

I want to believe you but it's a pretty damning accusation and I think here on HN people expect some citation to reliable sources.

• siftrics 4y ago
  https://twitter.com/wclementeiii/status/1592289824542949376 https://twitter.com/wclementeiii/status/1592289824542949376 That is hard evidence that Alameda took FTX customers' deposits. It is easy to find the original FTX Terms of Service which state that deposits are not lent out. Additionally, SBF himself tweeted that deposits are "never invested, not even in bonds" [verbatim].
  • googlryas 4y ago
    Is there some wordplay opening there? "It was a loan, not an investment"? "I gifted the money, I didn't invest it", etc...
    • siftrics 4y ago
      As if that morally exonerates him...
• zeven7 4y ago
  Vox: you tweeted out some stuff like - we never invest your deposits Vox: that was bs, right? SBF: it was factually accurate Vox: huh!!! but like - their deposits were totally not there? or do you just mean, technically it was Alameda SBF: FTX SBF: correct https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23462333/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-cryptocurrency-effective-altruism-crypto-bahamas-philanthropy https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23462333/sam-bankman-frie...