4 ms·

Did they exclude celebrities, politicians, and religious and political symbols? Deceitful extremists and vengeful criminals fabricating lies seem to be a far

• pkdpic 4y ago
  That's a really interesting point, and it makes me realize that the Nancy Reagan 'what constitutes porn' question is obviously super old and problematic. Also lexica.art is swarming with celebrity fantasy porn that just has a thin stylistic filter of paintings from the 19th century. And a plethora of furry daddies that you can't not love. I get why these models should be curated but I also like that the sketchy porn possibilities keep them feeling un-padded / interesting / dangerous. Then again this all is probably really dangerous so maybe that's silly.
  • rootusrootus 4y ago
    > Nancy Reagan 'what constitutes porn' question I thought that was Justice Stewart? And then he answered it "I know it when I see it."