4 ms·

Do pixels have human rights now?

• syockit 4y ago
  They don't. The training dataset though, may have been obtained through human rights violation. The problem is when the novelty starts to wear out. Then they will start to look for fresh training data which may again incur more human rights violation. If you can ensure that no new training data are obtained that way, then I guess it's okay? (Personally, I don't condone it)
  • Zuiii 4y ago
    > The problem is when the novelty starts to wear out. Isn't the main feature of stable diffusion is that it doesn't?
  • jeroenhd 4y ago
    Once again this does pose an interesting problem, though. The AI people claim no copyright issues with the generated issues because AI is different and the training data is not simply recreated. This would also imply that a model released by a paedophile generated out of illegal material would itself not be illegal, as the illegal data is not represented within the model. I very much doubt the police will look at AI this way when such models do eventually hit the web (assuming they haven't already) but at some point someone will get caught through this stuff and the arrest itself may have damning consequences throughout the AI space.
• npteljes 4y ago
  No, but people and enterprises have reputation.