> Given the highly falsifiable nature of his claims it should easy enough to disprove them. I'm not sure how a fever dream about something that happened 12,000

> Given the highly falsifiable nature of his claims it should easy enough to disprove them. I'm not sure how a fever dream about something that happened 12,000 years ago is falsifiable. What evidence would you propose falsifies his theories? If you believe you can watch a hundred proofs on both sides of flat-earth, you may want to reconsider your understanding of the word "proof". Proof is the burden of the claimant. If he had presented a plausible proof, there would probably be a spirited debate. It is curious that ignoring someone is considered "suppression" by those ignored.