4 ms·
A person in a position of power over her perceives their options as being a dichotomy between ensuring she can continue to produce output or terminating her con
by qubex 4y ago
A person in a position of power over her perceives their options as being a dichotomy between ensuring she can continue to produce output or terminating her contract. This is the crux of the matter that I am not misunderstanding. My “inappropriate judgement” is that this is at the very least heartless and tone-deaf. Let’s take it a step further and hypothesis what might happen if her equipment is destroyed or network connectivity goes down and makes it impossible for her to be productive? She becomes unproductive so heavy heart he ends her contract? Meanwhile they struggle to keep her useful so they can keep her compensation flowing?
She needs to succeed at the job or she gets axed. Than’s the crux of it. Given the circumstances I repeat it’s totally heartless and tone deaf. If you’re OK with that that’s your problem, and I feel a bit sorry for you.
- ivan_gammel 4y agoWhat is your suggestion exactly? I see you are in the mood for lecturing on morality, but what is the constructive solution that you offer? I repeat, the contract was signed during the war with the person that does not want to leave the country. Do I need to just pay everyone I hire this way and not expect them to work, as you suggest?