4 ms·
IOCP was missing a rather obvious feature until recently: disassociating a handle from an IOCP: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30688028/un-associate-socke
by amluto 4y ago
IOCP was missing a rather obvious feature until recently: disassociating a handle from an IOCP:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30688028/un-associate-socket-from-completion-port/35373536#35373536 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30688028/un-associate-so...
- magicalhippo 4y agoJust curious, what's the use-case for this?
- amluto 4y agoAny library that is supposed to leave a socket or other handle in the same state in which it got it.
- magicalhippo 4y agoYeah I suppose. Not used to such libraries, the ones I've used either control the creation of the handle or take ownership.