His arguments were not particularly coherent. My point is he insisted that nations have an absolute sovereignty and cannot be bound by other nations' or organis

His arguments were not particularly coherent. My point is he insisted that nations have an absolute sovereignty and cannot be bound by other nations' or organisations' will. But then there he goes telling Scotland what rules they are bound by, which they scarcely elected themselves. If Scotland wanted to have a referendum every other month, what's that to him, given his attitude to UK-EU relations? I think it's a bit nonsensical to have referenda on such important matters, with such poor standards on campaigning, and thresholds being simple majority, in the first place. Having one or two in a short time span is equally silly.