3 ms·
In my project, "rake environment" took 11.5 seconds on rails 3.1.x, and 8.7 seconds on rails 3.2. (1.9.3.p0 for both). I'm quite happy about this, as the initi
by burke 15y ago
In my project, "rake environment" took 11.5 seconds on rails 3.1.x, and 8.7 seconds on rails 3.2. (1.9.3.p0 for both).
I'm quite happy about this, as the initial development boot time is what's been bothering me most lately.
- jhealy 15y agoWe see ~20% improvement with the same upgrade (on 1.9.3p0). 8.5s to 6.6s on my laptop (with SSD). Nice!
- Fluxx 15y agoIMO, 6.6 seconds to boot the app is still too slow, but it's certainly progress. :)
- jhealy 15y agoSure, but it's better than the 15 seconds on ruby 1.9.2 and rails 3. Things are getting better!
- wfarr 15y agoSeeing about 25% speedup here with just the Rails 3.2 RC1. Combined with rspec-rails 2.8.0.rc2 (which includes some Rails 3.2-related changes), I saw my test suite go from ~2.5s (Rails 3.2.0.rc1 w/ rspec 2.7.x) to ~0.43s (Rails 3.2.0.rc1 w/ rspec 2.8.0.rc2). Ruby 1.9.3p0 across the board.