Hmm. Please correct me if I am misrepresenting a chain of events here. A.. tool lands that allows one use language model to generate content. People feed it f

Hmm. Please correct me if I am misrepresenting a chain of events here. A.. tool lands that allows one use language model to generate content. People feed it false data and share that, surprise, data it produces from the data the model is based on is false. How is this a surprise? I am still not sure why Meta would pull it? It can still be useful, but it was made not useful. I am not sure what a proper metaphor is for it, but it is almost like I give you a tool ( lets say a knife ) and you complain that the tool produces bad results when drinking soup. What am I missing here? <<or maybe it [Galactica] was removed because people like you [Marcus] abused the model and misrepresented it. Thanks for getting a useful and interesting public demo removed, this is why we can’t have nice things. <<Meta’s misstep—and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models. There is a large body of research that highlights the flaws of this technology, including its tendencies to reproduce prejudice and assert falsehoods as facts.