Thanks for taking the time to your thoughts in such clear and lengthy terms. This article seems more about drama than scientific merit. > Second, what’s the en

Thanks for taking the time to your thoughts in such clear and lengthy terms. This article seems more about drama than scientific merit. > Second, what’s the endgame here? What’s LeCun’s ideal? This section I think is particularly exemplary - regardless of your take here, I think it’s pretty ridiculous and uncharitable to interpret “criticism of science is immoral” from LeCun’s quoted statements.