3 ms·
This is a highly editorialized title. Perhaps we should link to the original source instead: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/11/18/1063487/meta-large-lang
by lopkeny12ko 4y ago
This is a highly editorialized title. Perhaps we should link to the original source instead: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/11/18/1063487/meta-large-language-model-ai-only-survived-three-days-gpt-3-science/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/11/18/1063487/meta-lar... "Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only three days online"
- Tomte 4y agoYou're wrong. I omitted a single word because of HN's length restriction (that was also dismissive and doesn't contribute much).
- lopkeny12ko 4y ago
- Tomte 4y ago
- lopkeny12ko 4y ago
- Tomte 4y agoBless your heart.
- dang 4y agoIt's not ok to post flamewar comments like this, regardless of how wrong someone else is or you feel they are. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it. Your comment would have been fine without the insults in the first two sentences. It seems clear that you and Tomte simply understand the meaning of the word "editorialize" differently. That's definitely not something to get into a spat about.
- dang 4y agoFlamewar attacks will get you banned, regardless of how wrong someone else is or you feel they are. We've had to ask you this before—e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31086037 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31086037. It seems clear that you and the lopkeny12ko simply understand the meaning of the word "editorialize" differently. That's definitely not something to get into a spat about.