3 ms·
I don't see how you can conclude that the Russians were "definitely" involved when the entirety of the evidence is coming from the word of spooks.
by fallingknife 4y ago
I don't see how you can conclude that the Russians were "definitely" involved when the entirety of the evidence is coming from the word of spooks.
- aa-jv 4y agoThey can't make this conclusion on the basis of any evidence, because that evidence just doesn't exist. This conclusion can only be made on the basis of nationalistic pride and blind faith in the spooks running the country. On that basis, it should be entirely ignored, since those spooks are also war criminals who are running from justice.