Sure that is a great working use case of tokens. The ONLY existing working use case though. To summarise it in short form - tokens allow people to avoid law. An

Sure that is a great working use case of tokens. The ONLY existing working use case though. To summarise it in short form - tokens allow people to avoid law. Any law - both laws in oppressive regimes focused on robbing its citizens, and in the legitimate countries where people are basically washing dirty stolen money, or avoiding taxes. And tokens provide (theoretically) indiscriminate access for such law avoidance to everyone, be they beggars or billionaires. To paraphrase - tokenbros frame their invention as kitchen knives, sure some people are killing others with kitchen knives, but that's the rounding error compared to the legitimate usage. On the other hand, in my personal opinion, tokens are closer to nukes or bioweapons, than to kitchen knives. Sure, libertarians may argue that if every single person a on planet would be armed with an athrax throwing gun we would be very independent and free. But in reality of course power would quickly coalesce in the hand of neofeudal lords, and humanity will quickly degrade instead of improving. Weapon analogy is about financial impact. Sure, if every person could send any amount of money anywhere without any questions, then at first we will thing it's great. I personally could benefit from it too. But in reality billionaries operating outside of the law (remember - tokes provide equal access) will screw us a lot more, than the benefits gained from a few undeclared and untaxed private transactions.