The author conflate things which are not equivalent to make an emotional reference rather than a rational one. They take a few real issues, misdiagnose them an

The author conflate things which are not equivalent to make an emotional reference rather than a rational one. They take a few real issues, misdiagnose them and then swerve from fallacy to fallacy. "And who knows more about a job than the person performing it?" It turns out usually many. A person who thinks their job is pointless isn't usually the best judge of a project. They may be right. They may just be ignorant of the bigger picture. Of course people feel this way but it doesn't make it true. Starting from the first example of being told to work when it wasn't their break they come off more like a child asking why they have to clean their room or or brush their teeth because they lack rhe oerspective to make sense of it. They then conflate that as being equivalent to several completely different situations, again coming off as if they are a child who lacks perspective or understanding...