My hot take is this is the start of vastly (better/worse) surveillance- that can be a force for good or bad. Let's start with business meetings - the tech is c

My hot take is this is the start of vastly (better/worse) surveillance- that can be a force for good or bad. Let's start with business meetings - the tech is close enough to be able to record, transcribe and summarise all decisions and action points - which sounds great and may get put into place. Then it can assess how well a manager was "coaching" the meeting - getting appropriate feedback from all participants - then were all necessary participants there ? Then we can see training sessions geared specifically towards manager A and their problem in encouraging positive performance from their team with vague goals. Wouldn't we all like better managers with clearer goals? Roll this out to a doctors bedside manner, or the mistaken command given to a nurse that was a perhaps misheard and the wrong medicine given or ... We can surveil all our waking lives - and almost the only thing social sciences get right is large population statistics- we can find out who leads happiest best lives and be taught how to do it better. Or we can stomp out individuality and live on a totalitarian nightmare. But we don't get to not play the game