4 ms·
if a people holds certain actions to be reprehensible, then completely unironically, yes.
by toofy 4y ago
if a people holds certain actions to be reprehensible, then completely unironically, yes.
- DiogenesKynikos 4y agoReprehensible actions like cheerleading the invasion of Iraq, as the New York Times did in 2002-2003?
- yks 4y agoPeople of the wrong political orientation are now cheerleading the Russians in their invasion of Ukraine, so they are bad regardless of their current position on Iraq of 2002. Wrong/bad because of the suffering brought to the world.
- lzooz 4y agoWait you mean those who think the US should meddle with it right?
- lzooz 4y agoWho decides what is reprehensible? Before you say "common sense" or "the Western global elites", think twice.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- toofy 4y ago> ...who decides... i do. you do. we do. im not sure what people are looking for when they ask this absurd question. while this may not be the case with you, i suspect its usually asked in bad-faith by people who are trying to insinuate that all actions are equally (non)reprehensible--which is of course, nonsense. we start with certain foundations, we hold that certain truths are self-evident. and we build from there. wHo dEcIdEs!?! we do.
- DiogenesKynikos 4y agoOkay then. I disagree with you. Is the US government going to stop trying to put Julian Assange behind bars for 175 years now?