3 ms·
In my opinion, the situation where only a few powerful countries with quite stable institutions have nukes is better for humanity than the situation where every
by aubanel 4y ago
In my opinion, the situation where only a few powerful countries with quite stable institutions have nukes is better for humanity than the situation where every country has their own nukes.
Just consider the number of coups
or wars going on every decade: if everyone the incumbent leader knows that they can just press the red button and wipe out their opponents, of course it would en up happening one day, and could trigger a chain reaction.
This risk of "president goes mad" (don't look at the button Vladimir) is minimal when as few countries as possible have nukes.
Of course, this goes against the social justice between countries - but wait, does that concept even exist?
- 2Gkashmiri 4y agouh,,,, trump doesn't fall into the "president goes mad"? wasn't he the single guy who walked away from iran deal when even iran was willing to satisfy their end and EU urged US to reconsider but trump refused? could that not have solved "A LOT OF OUR PROBLEMS" and problems of ordinary citizens living in iran? but no. trump had to fuck this one up and looks like he wants a second run.