3 ms·
well, it was interesting stuff, proving how the primaries were heavy biased against Sanders https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-cha
by kome 4y ago
well, it was interesting stuff, proving how the primaries were heavy biased against Sanders https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex...
I think, that overall, it was an interesting and meaningful leak. Not just "toxic".
- MallocVoidstar 4y agoIt was "toxic to touch" in that it was hacked material of an American political party, which you might not want to be redistributing publicly (such as hosting on a server) if you can't afford lawyers.
- hedora 4y agoIn the US, once a secret is leaked, it becomes public knowledge. The DNC could try to assert copyrights over the emails, but that would be admitting they are genuine, and unlikely to actually work.