3 ms·
>maybe spend less time fleshing out offensive capabilities and more time on defense of your citizens With our budget the two are not mutually exclusive
by edgyquant 4y ago
>maybe spend less time fleshing out offensive capabilities and more time on defense of your citizens
With our budget the two are not mutually exclusive
- prvit 4y agoAnd they’re often the same. Take cyber “offensive” capabilities for example. Why do those exist? To provide intelligence for defense.
- Godel_unicode 4y agoNot really? Cyber threat intelligence is an incredibly overblown industry, remarkably similar to the xkcd about crypto. Offensive capabilities are for Natanz. Everyone seems to think they need super ninja threat intel to protect them from elite nation state hackers, meanwhile they’re being randomware’d with metasploit modules from 8 months ago. Run A/V and patch, that’ll be $1.7million, thanks.
- prvit 4y agoNothing in my comment has anything to do with “cyber threat intelligence”. Did you reply to the wrong comment?
- Godel_unicode 4y ago> To provide intelligence for defense. Did you forget what you wrote?
- prvit 4y agoI didn’t forget what I wrote, I just exist in the real world where missiles are a bigger threat than hackers.