2 ms·
Are you seriously saying that it’s more important that the number of viewers on ESPN (or whoever, who have already paid FIFA) for USA v Wales reads 5,628,273 ra
by smcl 4y ago
Are you seriously saying that it’s more important that the number of viewers on ESPN (or whoever, who have already paid FIFA) for USA v Wales reads 5,628,273 rather than 5,628,274 … than a man who has millions of followers loudly and proudly declaring they won’t be swayed by sportswashing and that nobody else should be either (while exposing in detail exactly why)?
Come on.
- padjo 4y agoNo I’m saying if viewership was down 50% for this World Cup Fifa do you think Fifa would do this again? Are you seriously saying that you think FIFA care one bit about some TV personality making strident declarations while acknowledging loudly that they will continue to consume FIFAs product?
- smcl 4y agoYes FIFA absolutely care that basically all coverage of the World Cup across the world mentions that it is a fucking shambles, cost countless thousands of lives and has basically exposed their corruption. They won't stop being corrupt, but they'll be much less egregious next time - they simply cannot pull off another Qatar. Hell, even Sepp Blatter admitted it was a mistake ahead of the tournament.