5 ms·
Ask HN: What modern “legendary” programmer prefers IDE other than Vim or Emacs?
By "modern" I mean, started programming around a time when emacs, vim AND other (e.g. Visual Studio) were available to choose from
- themodelplumber 4y agoI remembered this Geany example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePZEkbbf3fc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePZEkbbf3fc Bio: > My name is Kamil Dębowski (or Errichto) and I'm quite good at competitive programming. I'm a finalist of multiple big programming competitions like ICPC, Facebook Hacker Cup and Google Code Jam (even got 2nd place in 2018). I also organize competitions, which means inventing and preparing problems. Not sure if they still use Geany, or if you consider this person legendary (some people really gatekeep around words like that), but there's at least a data point for you.
- mattewong 4y agoHad not seen that before thank you!
- yeputons 4y agoThat's for competitive programming, you really want to stick with the most common tools there. Otherwise you have to learn different set of stuff for each on-site competition. Common as in "included in the standard OS image at competitions". For example, I use Far Manager/Kate for competitive programming and small scripts (sometimes Vim), but not way I use any of these for professional development.
- themodelplumber 4y agoTrying to understand this--are Far Manager & Kate included in the standard OS image at competitions, but your favorite work IDE is not? Or is it more that your work config files & plugins are not available/needed in competitions?
- yeputons 4y agoYes. In some competitions about ten years ago in ex-USSR it was typically Windows + Far Manager (maybe some other stuff, but not always), in international competitions it was some flavor of Linux with a stock KDE (hence Kate) or GNOME (hence Gedit). No professional IDEs almost certainly (no license to use), and the set of free IDEs depends on what organizers like: some installed NetBeans, some installed Eclipse CDT, some did both, some did neither. No external resources like configs and plugins are typically allowed either. Of course, it depends on a competition. I'm mostly talking about IOI (International Olympiad in Informatics for school students) and ICPC (International Collegiate Programming Contest). Online competitions are another beast.
- mattewong 4y agointeresting, had no idea of those limitations / considerations in competitive programming
- smoldesu 4y agoI dunno. Mark Zuckerberg?
- mattewong 4y agoFrom what I gather, Zuckerberg used emacs, so unless that information is wrong, then he would not be a responsive answer to this question. Thanks anyway
- mattl 4y agoSo anyone programming in the last 25 years or so? 25 years ago I was using a mix of Visual Studio and Emacs. 25 years later I use Emacs a bit but don’t write much code. I use BBEdit more than Emacs now.
- athielking 4y agoI know John Carmack prefers an IDE. I believe he talks about it in this interview with Lex Fridman https://youtu.be/I845O57ZSy4 https://youtu.be/I845O57ZSy4
- orf 4y agoHonest question: what’s the point of this question? what does it matter? If “legendary programmers” all chiseled bits into a disk with a scalpel would that make it a good idea? Use whatever makes you comfortable and allow others to do the same. Don’t emulate or even care about “legendary programmers” tooling.
- karp773 4y agoLet me respectfully disagree. Tooling is super important in any trade but in programming it can make be multiplier (all other things being equal).
- orf 4y agoIt's like saying "What modern olympic gold medal runners prefer Adidas shoes over Nike?", with the implication that Adidas shoes are inferior in some way. They are olympians, you're not. Use whatever shoes you want to use. Tooling does matter, but what "legendary programmers" tooling looks like doesn't outside of a professional curiosity.
- ano88888 4y agoif you don't learn from the best, how do you improve?
- nequo 4y agoLegendary programmers don’t become legendary because of their text editors but because of the code that they write. Linus Torvalds has used a janky version of micro Emacs that he picked up as a university student in Finland.[1] Will it make you a better programmer if you switch to his editor? No. Just use whatever you are comfortable with, like he has. He has used this editor because he got used to its peculiar keybindings. He rather worked on the kernel than to learn new keybindings. [1] https://github.com/torvalds/uemacs https://github.com/torvalds/uemacs
- pjmlp 4y agoIf IT would actually learn from the past it wouldn't be a fashion driven industry.
- tails4e 4y agoAndreas kling of serenityOS uses clion, and makes good use of its features. He's an awesome programmer, and no doubt proficient in vim if he needs to be, but seeing him interact with the IDE does shown its use, especially with the speed he operates at.
- mattewong 4y agoThank you, had not heard of him and found some useful info in various places including: https://usesthis.com/interviews/andreas.kling/ https://usesthis.com/interviews/andreas.kling/
- wilg 4y agoemacs and vim people write code that is as confusing as their editors. change my view
- jasonjmcghee 4y agoSeems short-sighted to jump to conclusions about people's output based on the tools they use.
- wilg 4y agowell, yes, true. but the design of your environment affects your design sensibilities
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]