3 ms·
I find these <strike>anti</strike>-CoffeeScript articles annoying. I use CoffeeScript, because it works for me. If it doesn't work for you, whatever, write plai
by Void_ 15y ago
I find these <strike>anti</strike>-CoffeeScript articles annoying. I use CoffeeScript, because it works for me. If it doesn't work for you, whatever, write plain JavaScript.
This article just argues over what is and what is not a language.
- adeelk 15y agoYou didn’t read the article. It supports CoffeeScript.
- Void_ 15y agoDidn't read the whole thing, nope. But the title says "CoffeeScript is not worth learning".
- icebraining 15y agoBut the title says "CoffeeScript is not worth learning". No, it says "it's not a language worth learning". The author's point is that CoffeeScript is not a language, but a tool for JavaScript.
- Void_ 15y agoI think it's quite obvious the title is deliberately misleading to get more people to read it.
- icebraining 15y agoSure, but that doesn't excuse people from commenting without reading it.
- evoltix 15y agoThe title is still misleading. It doesn't become clear that the author is advocating CoffeeScript until the end of the article.
- frou_dh 15y agoThe correct response at this point is: Oh dear, I will endeavour to read articles in the future :)