>> Equating any telemetry=spying is a knee jerk reaction to tech companies abusing telemetry. > Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemetry https://en.wikiped

>> Equating any telemetry=spying is a knee jerk reaction to tech companies abusing telemetry. > Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemetry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemetry disagrees It feels like your response fails to address the point colejohnson66 is making. They are saying "some spying is done via telemetry, but not all telemetry is spyware." The automatic nature of it is orthogonal to its spy-ness or user hostility. Basically, "automatic" here is an antonym to "manual" e.g. user emailing a bug report. Personally, I consider the following sorts of telemetry "not spyware": - coarse grained crash report (build version, arch, etc). this is usually a manual prompt on crash, so "semi-automatic telemetry" is how I'd define it - anonymized metrics/spans. Basically "foo_bar() took 20ms". These are "automatic" in that the collection and transmission happen without user input, but that's orthogonal to whether the user opted in/out. Fine-grained usage information is a lot more spyware-esque.