2 ms·
It’s an unspecified but required to be valid value for the moved type. The author mentions it’s a smart pointer type, which could easily be defined to act like
by twoodfin 4y ago
It’s an unspecified but required to be valid value for the moved type. The author mentions it’s a smart pointer type, which could easily be defined to act like this.
- CamperBob2 4y agoIt appears that you need to be really smart in order to not blow your own foot off with this "smart pointer." I'll stick to the regular dumb kind, thanks.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]