3 ms·
Almost stopped reading after web 1.0 was explained as “readonly”. Eventually got to this: > People who think a single-sign on is somehow a good thing. I would
by infotogivenm 4y ago
Almost stopped reading after web 1.0 was explained as “readonly”. Eventually got to this:
> People who think a single-sign on is somehow a good thing.
I would love to see this expanded on… I stopped reading after that.
- g147 4y agoI wanted to keep it all as short as I could. Maybe adding more hyperlinks will help. https://sis.binus.ac.id/2022/07/21/the-differences-between-web-1-0-web-2-0-and-web-3-0/ https://sis.binus.ac.id/2022/07/21/the-differences-between-w... https://www.renovodata.com/blog/2019/01/17/single-sign-on https://www.renovodata.com/blog/2019/01/17/single-sign-on
- infotogivenm 4y agoThis is better. I always equated web 1.0 with “before web 2.0”, I did not know of Berner-lee’s description. There were lots of dynamic server apps between 1.0 and 2.0. For SSO, the link does a good job presenting various pros and cons. I don’t think it backs up the articles dismissal.