> There were multiple executives making $10m/yr+ > These are paid professionals who are supposedly wealthy, good at their jobs, smart, informed, etc. Wealth i

> There were multiple executives making $10m/yr+ > These are paid professionals who are supposedly wealthy, good at their jobs, smart, informed, etc. Wealth is not a valid indicator of ability. I'm not judging the execs and board members individually but rather questioning your assumption. I have read you mention "supposedly", yet it can be read as a rhetorical term.