>>That was completely and utterly a senior US political position that demanded non existeant evidence to support a bizarro "known unknowns" claim Asking people

>>That was completely and utterly a senior US political position that demanded non existeant evidence to support a bizarro "known unknowns" claim Asking people to "Prove a negative" is such a logical stupidity that is hard to understand how often people get into this. Imagine you ordering something online on Amazon. And not getting it delivered. And then when you complain to Amazon about this, they asking you to provide a proof that it was not delivered and you don't have it. How does somebody prove they don't have something? How do they get punished for not showing the absence of something they don't have?