4 ms·
> Anyways, earth gave us plenty of non animal derived product to thrive on It really didn't. Essentially every vegetable you have ever eaten is the product of
by puffoflogic 4y ago
> Anyways, earth gave us plenty of non animal derived product to thrive on
It really didn't. Essentially every vegetable you have ever eaten is the product of millennia of genetic modification by humans and is completely unrecognizable relative to its natural form. Cabbage, broccoli, kale, and collard greens are all horrifically mutated forms of a single natural species, engineered specifically for mass human consumption. Compare this to animals: livestock are of course influenced by husbandry but not anywhere near the same extent. One can easily match livestock to their natural forms; e.g. chicken to junglefowl; cattle to other bovine species; domesticated hogs to wild hogs. Probably none of these species is more changed than, say, the domestic dog so it's not even clear one can attribute the changes to the needs of human consumption as one does with vegetables.
If the naturality argument holds water, then it in no way points us to the produce aisle, but rather to the butcher's.
- uxcolumbo 4y agoTell that to the factory farm chickens who can’t stand anymore because they weigh 3-4 times the weight of natural chickens.
- ranguna 4y agoYour comment take the "best lie" of the year award. All mass produced live stock have been carefully selected for breeding and slaughtering, all of them, chickens, cows, pigs, ducks, the lot. Not only selective breeding, but also chemical treatment due to the conditions they are grown in. So no, they have changed susbtancially. Do you think the "original" pig was this fat? The "original" cow produced this much milk? The "original" chicken produced this many eggs and meat?
- YLE118 4y agoRecently there was an interesting discussion on here about a blog post discussing pigs in medieval times. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33318215 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33318215