3 ms·
I'd be shocked if you thought there's was actually no correlation if you're thinking of a price range from $5 to $100+. The worst wines by far I've had have bee
by fullshark 4y ago
I'd be shocked if you thought there's was actually no correlation if you're thinking of a price range from $5 to $100+. The worst wines by far I've had have been the ultra cheap stuff. Once you get above like $20 or whatever your personal threshold is though the variance is much smaller in terms of quality I'd say.
- metadat 4y agoYou do make a good point; the worst of the worst tend to be the ultra cheapies. With that said, there are unbounded arrays of cheap and expensive selections that all taste like shit (again, in my opinion - others likely perceive them differently). I've met plenty of people who happily drink something I consider 100% not palatable or suitable for human consumption.
- fullshark 4y agoYeah bad (as in unappealing to my palate) expensive wines are bad in an entirely different unique, "expensive tasting" way.