5 ms·
I've been dabbling in smartwatches because of the built-in step counters, trying to get healthy, etc. The main thing I found I appreciated is the automatic tim
by foobarian 4y ago
I've been dabbling in smartwatches because of the built-in step counters, trying to get healthy, etc. The main thing I found I appreciated is the automatic time sync including DST switchover.
There is a long list of negatives:
- Battery life is miserable compared to a classic watch
- Screen activation is unreliable. Imagine a classic watch not visible when you look at it.
- Bad UX. Somehow the brightness settings I apply randomly get reset/reverted. This is probably hit or miss depending on brand, I expect Apple's devices have this nailed.
- Outdoor performance. This is the worst one. The screen is just not readable under bright sunlight. I find myself making a little tent out of whatever I have on and furiously shaking my wrist to activate the screen just so I can tell the time. This is what's going to make me ultimately switch back to a classic watch unless I can find one with e-ink. I'm not sure how Apple's devices fare here beyond friends saying 'it works fine.'
- tentacleuno 4y agoHeh, I recently got the chance to discover that my trusty W-86 automatically adjusts for DST. On the topic of battery life, it's still going after 6 months!
- ubermonkey 4y agoIt may not be an option for you based on your other tech choices, but I feel like the Apple Watch excels at all of the things you mention here except, obviously, battery life vs. a conventional nonsmart watch. I supposed UX can be a matter of taste, but I've found it's simple enough to set up an Apple Watch such that I have rapid access to the features and functions I need in a given situation. In particular, outdoor usage -- even in bright sun -- is pretty great. I've done no small amount of hiking with mine, and use it often when cycling. Readability is fine!
- fridek 4y agoYou might like Withings Steel HR. It easily lasts a month on a single charge. Conversly, I now have their more premium Scanwatch, and I feel the UX regressed, while the added functions are not for me.
- kramerger 4y agoCompared to ordinary smart watches the Whitings watches feel a lot more "grown up" to me. (I also liked Kronaby a lot, but those were quite expensive)
- jkepler 4y agoI had a basic Withings, not the Steel, and there was a lot I liked about it, particularly getting many months out of each battery, and the step counter being a dial from 0 to 50 to 100% of whatever target number of steps one set in the companion app. But, for me, the lack of a second hand and backlighting or glow-in-the-dark hands & numbers, combined with the strong potential that my health data was being snooped on, convinced me to return to a traditional analog face wristwatch. But I may look into the OP's original Casio - a sturdy watch with a barometer and compass built in, that would be handy.
- marcus0x62 4y agoHave you looked at/tried the Garmin smart watches? I wear an Instinct 2, and from your list I’d say: - Battery life is around 25 - 30 days (it would be longer if I was outside more and got more benefit from solar charging) - The screen is always visible - The UX on the watch is pretty terrible, not going to lie. - Not a problem at all. When it is very, very, dark I have to press a button to temporarily activate the backlight.
- mikestew 4y agoWhen it is very, very, dark I have to press a button to temporarily activate the backlight. The Fenix 3 I wore like ten years ago had a setting to turn the backlight on when I turned my wrist. It was not as reliable as the same functionality on Apple Watch, but good enough. I’m an Apple Watch guy myself, but I’ve got a drawer full of Garmins, and they might make a fine choice for OP.
- marcus0x62 4y agoI don’t think the instinct line does this, but it does highlight something worth mentioning for anyone considering Garmin watches — these aren’t like Apple watches, where there are a few key differences between the various models. The UX and feature set is wildly different, and there isn’t even a real hierarchy where you can say “model a has features 1 and 2; model b has that plus feature 3; etc.”
- tolger 4y agoI second the Garmin Instinct Solar as a really good everyday watch. I got tired of charging my Apple Watch everyday and getting annoying notifications all the time. I just wanted something to keep track of my walks, track my sleep and give me basic watch functions such as alarms, timers and stopwatch. The Instinct is perfect for that. I also have it set so that the backlight turns automatically on when it's dark and I flip my wrist. I wear it to bed (sleep tracking) and I can always check the time if I wake up in the middle of the night.
- slaw 4y agoWhat watch are you talking about? Apple watch 7 is perfectly usable for me outdoors. It has 1000 nits screen. https://support.apple.com/kb/SP860 https://support.apple.com/kb/SP860
- seltzered_ 4y agolook at the pebble community threads for recommendations as they generally want the same thing. for example heres one where many seem to suggest the 'fossil collider' https://www.reddit.com/r/pebble/comments/v9966o/comment/ibw0pzr/ https://www.reddit.com/r/pebble/comments/v9966o/comment/ibw0...
- alpaca128 4y agoMost Garmin GPS watches (except for newer expensive models) have an LCD screen that's perfectly readable under sunlight, only when it's dark I need to tap the screen to activate the backlight. At least one model has an integrated solar panel which can significantly extend battery life while GPS isn't used. But personally I have fiddled around with 5 different Garmin watches and think their UX in menus is simply horrible on average, mine is okay for my use-case but I'd advise to never buy them blindly.