3 ms·
> I am 25. I am very interested in your generation and the phenomenon of nascent tech rejection. I think it may be a great hope for us finally solving many pro
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
> I am 25.
I am very interested in your generation and the phenomenon of nascent
tech rejection. I think it may be a great hope for us finally solving
many problems in software engineering that are more to do with culture
and society than bits and bytes.
There's a famous Douglas Adams witticism:
1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and
ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and
thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can
probably get a career in it.
3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural
order of things.
He was absolutely spot-on for my generation. But this doesn't hold any
longer, and I've been pondering why.
I think my generation saw tech as a hope, as rebellious and
progressive, and exciting from the get-go. We were raised on mostly
optimistic sci-fi and ideas of space exploration etc.
Today, kids are born into a world where tech represents a threat.
It's systems of control and stuff that makes their parents
unavailable, frustrated and sick. They inutially accept that until
reaching teens when they become rebellious and independent thinkers
who reject that way of suffering and subjugation.
Am I close to the mark?
- sverona 4y agoI was very bullish on tech for a long time. What turned me off was the bad patterns that crop up all over social networks (see Twitter/Facebook culture in re: performative activism) and, more than anything, actually writing code in the year 202X.