If you were arguing in good faith then surely you’d use the argument I’d presented already, and not ignore it for your convenience. Since we’re playing the log

If you were arguing in good faith then surely you’d use the argument I’d presented already, and not ignore it for your convenience. Since we’re playing the logic game (and it would be strange if we were playing some game without logic - I fear that you may be), trans-men are a sub-category of women, not men, so you’ll need to expand on which part of my argument is moot.